Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HAYNESWORTH v. CORRECT CARE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, 19-6150. (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: infco20190806082 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2019
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Alphonso Haynesworth appeals from the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part, granting summary judgment to Defendants on his constitutional claims brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012), declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his South Carolina state law claims, and dismissing those claims without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find n
More

UNPUBLISHED

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Alphonso Haynesworth appeals from the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part, granting summary judgment to Defendants on his constitutional claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his South Carolina state law claims, and dismissing those claims without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haynesworth v. Correct Care Recovery Sols., No. 2:17-cv-03247-CMC (D.S.C. Dec. 20, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer