Filed: Jan. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1872 LORETTA K. BETHEA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRESIDENT DERIONNE P. POLLARD, Montgomery College, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:18-cv-02768-PX) Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 23, 2020 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Loretta K. Bet
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1872 LORETTA K. BETHEA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRESIDENT DERIONNE P. POLLARD, Montgomery College, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:18-cv-02768-PX) Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 23, 2020 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Loretta K. Beth..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1872 LORETTA K. BETHEA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRESIDENT DERIONNE P. POLLARD, Montgomery College, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:18-cv-02768-PX) Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 23, 2020 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Loretta K. Bethea, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Jeanne Ashbarry, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Loretta K. Bethea appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and dismissing with prejudice Bethea’s complaint alleging employment discrimination and retaliation after Bethea failed to file an amended complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bethea v. Pollard, No. 8:18-cv-02768-PX (D. Md. June 4, 2019 & July 10, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2