Filed: Feb. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2036 ROBERT V. WILKIE, individually and as Executor of the Estate of Judith Kathryn Sellers Wilkie, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00314-MR-WCM) Submitted: January 27, 2020 Decided: February 13, 2020 Before KING and HARRIS, Circu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2036 ROBERT V. WILKIE, individually and as Executor of the Estate of Judith Kathryn Sellers Wilkie, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00314-MR-WCM) Submitted: January 27, 2020 Decided: February 13, 2020 Before KING and HARRIS, Circui..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-2036
ROBERT V. WILKIE, individually and as Executor of the Estate of Judith Kathryn
Sellers Wilkie,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00314-MR-WCM)
Submitted: January 27, 2020 Decided: February 13, 2020
Before KING and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert V. Wilkie, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert V. Wilkie appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ.
P. 60(b)(1) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See MLC
Auto., LLC v. Town of S. Pines,
532 F.3d 269, 277 (4th Cir. 2008) (providing standard).
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2