Filed: Mar. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2111 ORLANDO IRA BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SUNTRUST BANK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (8:19-cv-00992-MBS) Submitted: March 13, 2020 Decided: March 18, 2020 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Orlando Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublishe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2111 ORLANDO IRA BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SUNTRUST BANK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (8:19-cv-00992-MBS) Submitted: March 13, 2020 Decided: March 18, 2020 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Orlando Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-2111
ORLANDO IRA BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUNTRUST BANK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (8:19-cv-00992-MBS)
Submitted: March 13, 2020 Decided: March 18, 2020
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Orlando Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Orlando Ira Brown appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2018). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. SunTrust Bank, No. 8:19-cv-
00992-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2