Filed: Jan. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2197 In re: VICTOR B. PERKINS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:19-cv-00822-DKC) Submitted: January 23, 2020 Decided: January 27, 2020 Before WYNN, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Bernard Perkins, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Victor B. Perkins petitions for a writ of mandamus, al
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2197 In re: VICTOR B. PERKINS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:19-cv-00822-DKC) Submitted: January 23, 2020 Decided: January 27, 2020 Before WYNN, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Bernard Perkins, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Victor B. Perkins petitions for a writ of mandamus, all..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2197 In re: VICTOR B. PERKINS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:19-cv-00822-DKC) Submitted: January 23, 2020 Decided: January 27, 2020 Before WYNN, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Bernard Perkins, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Victor B. Perkins petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his civil case. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the court dismissed Perkins’ action on November 20, 2019. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Perkins’ case, while we grant Perkins leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
