Filed: Apr. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2465 WEN CHIANN YEH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY; NORA F. SULLIVAN, Attorney, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00279-D) Submitted: April 14, 2020 Decided: April 16, 2020 Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2465 WEN CHIANN YEH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY; NORA F. SULLIVAN, Attorney, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00279-D) Submitted: April 14, 2020 Decided: April 16, 2020 Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cur..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2465 WEN CHIANN YEH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY; NORA F. SULLIVAN, Attorney, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00279-D) Submitted: April 14, 2020 Decided: April 16, 2020 Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wen Chiann Yeh, Appellant Pro Se. Zachary Alexander Padget, Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Wen Chiann Yeh appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss her complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court and deny Yeh’s motion to recuse the district court judge. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
