Filed: Feb. 20, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6670 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAHEEM BRYANT-ROYAL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:12-cr-00040-ELH-1; 1:16-cv-02891-ELH) Submitted: December 27, 2019 Decided: February 20, 2020 Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished pe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6670 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAHEEM BRYANT-ROYAL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:12-cr-00040-ELH-1; 1:16-cv-02891-ELH) Submitted: December 27, 2019 Decided: February 20, 2020 Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6670
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAHEEM BRYANT-ROYAL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:12-cr-00040-ELH-1; 1:16-cv-02891-ELH)
Submitted: December 27, 2019 Decided: February 20, 2020
Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
C. Justin Brown, BROWN LAW, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Robert K. Hur,
United States Attorney, Jason D. Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daheem Bryant-Royal appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bryant-
Royal, Nos. 1:12-cr-00040-ELH-1; 1:16-cv-02891-ELH (D. Md. May 1, 2019). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2