In Re: Randell Troutman, 19-6988 (2020)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: 19-6988
Visitors: 22
Filed: Mar. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6988 In re: RANDELL COY TROUTMAN, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Submitted: February 19, 2020 Decided: March 3, 2020 Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randell Coy Troutman, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Randell Coy Troutman filed a petition for an original writ of ha
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6988 In re: RANDELL COY TROUTMAN, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Submitted: February 19, 2020 Decided: March 3, 2020 Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randell Coy Troutman, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Randell Coy Troutman filed a petition for an original writ of hab..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6988
In re: RANDELL COY TROUTMAN,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Submitted: February 19, 2020 Decided: March 3, 2020
Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randell Coy Troutman, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Randell Coy Troutman filed a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus
challenging his drug trafficking and firearm convictions and 360-month sentence imposed
in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. This court ordinarily
declines to entertain original habeas corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018), and
this case provides no reason to depart from the general rule. Moreover, we find that the
interest of justice would not be served by transferring the case to a district court. See 28
U.S.C. § 1631 (2018). Accordingly, we deny Troutman’s motion for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
2
Source: CourtListener