Filed: Jan. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7063 LARRY PERCELL MAYBIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEPUTY MORRISON; DEPUTY GREENE; DEPUTY MCBRYER; DEPUTY MARTIN; DEPUTY LONG, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (7:19-cv-01138-TMC-PJG) Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 23, 2020 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7063 LARRY PERCELL MAYBIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEPUTY MORRISON; DEPUTY GREENE; DEPUTY MCBRYER; DEPUTY MARTIN; DEPUTY LONG, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (7:19-cv-01138-TMC-PJG) Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 23, 2020 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7063
LARRY PERCELL MAYBIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPUTY MORRISON; DEPUTY GREENE; DEPUTY MCBRYER; DEPUTY
MARTIN; DEPUTY LONG,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Spartanburg. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (7:19-cv-01138-TMC-PJG)
Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 23, 2020
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Percell Maybin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larry Percell Maybin appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint for failure to comply with a court order and failure
to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maybin v. Morrison, No. 7:19-cv-01138-
TMC-PJG (D.S.C. July 1, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2