Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

James McNeill v. Marquhne Johnson, 19-7270 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 19-7270 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7270 JAMES C. MCNEILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARQUHNE BENJAMIN JOHNSON, Correctional Officer; CEDRIC GRAHAM, Correctional Officer; JACKIE YANG, Registered Nurse; KARIEM LANE, Correctional Officer; KEVIN WHITE, Correctional Lieutenant; ALFRED WILLIAMS, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; SUSAN MORRISON, Correctional Officer, Defendants - Appellees, and JHON HERRING, Correctional Superintendent; WILLIAM HORNE, Correctional Hous
More
                                     UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                                       No. 19-7270


JAMES C. MCNEILL,

                     Plaintiff - Appellant,

              v.

MARQUHNE BENJAMIN JOHNSON, Correctional Officer; CEDRIC GRAHAM,
Correctional Officer; JACKIE YANG, Registered Nurse; KARIEM LANE,
Correctional Officer; KEVIN WHITE, Correctional Lieutenant; ALFRED
WILLIAMS, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; SUSAN MORRISON, Correctional
Officer,

                     Defendants - Appellees,

              and

JHON HERRING, Correctional Superintendent; WILLIAM HORNE, Correctional
Housing Unit Manager,

                     Defendants.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:18-cv-00188-FDW)


Submitted: January 21, 2020                                    Decided: January 24, 2020


Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.


Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James C. McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.




                                            2
PER CURIAM:

       James C. McNeill seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his request for

production of documents and his motions to compel discovery. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2018), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2018); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 
337 U.S. 541
, 545-46 (1949). The order McNeill seeks to appeal is neither a

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                                               DISMISSED




                                             3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer