Filed: Jun. 09, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7661 HENRY WAYNE COLLIER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. R. HUDGINS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:19-cv-00234-FPS) Submitted: April 16, 2020 Decided: June 9, 2020 Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry Wayne Co
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7661 HENRY WAYNE COLLIER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. R. HUDGINS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:19-cv-00234-FPS) Submitted: April 16, 2020 Decided: June 9, 2020 Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry Wayne Col..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7661
HENRY WAYNE COLLIER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
R. HUDGINS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:19-cv-00234-FPS)
Submitted: April 16, 2020 Decided: June 9, 2020
Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Wayne Collier, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Henry Wayne Collier, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018)
petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Collier v. Hudgins, No. 5:19-cv-00234-FPS (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 29, 2019); see also Braswell
v. Smith,
952 F.3d 441, 450 (4th Cir. 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2