Filed: Apr. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7826 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRANDON FOSTER, a/k/a Beezie, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:07-cr-00112-RGD-FBS-4) Submitted: April 10, 2020 Decided: April 16, 2020 Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brand
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7826 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRANDON FOSTER, a/k/a Beezie, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:07-cr-00112-RGD-FBS-4) Submitted: April 10, 2020 Decided: April 16, 2020 Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brando..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7826 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRANDON FOSTER, a/k/a Beezie, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:07-cr-00112-RGD-FBS-4) Submitted: April 10, 2020 Decided: April 16, 2020 Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brandon Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Brandon Foster appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See United States v. Foster, No. 4:07-cr-00112-RGD-FBS-4 (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2019; Sept. 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
