Filed: Jul. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7894 WILLIAM SATTERFIELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GILMORE HICKS; APRIL GREEN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cv-00170-JAG-RCY) Submitted: July 21, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020 Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Satterfield, Appell
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7894 WILLIAM SATTERFIELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GILMORE HICKS; APRIL GREEN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cv-00170-JAG-RCY) Submitted: July 21, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020 Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Satterfield, Appella..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7894
WILLIAM SATTERFIELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GILMORE HICKS; APRIL GREEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cv-00170-JAG-RCY)
Submitted: July 21, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Satterfield, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Satterfield appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2018) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2018). * We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Satterfield v. Hicks, No. 3:19-cv-00170-JAG-RCY (E.D. Va. Nov. 25,
2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Although the district court dismissed Satterfield’s claims without prejudice, we
have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC,
959 F.3d 605, 615 (4th Cir.
2020).
2