Filed: Jul. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1179 BRENDA COLEMAN GILLIS, Debtor - Appellant, v. SUZANNE E. WADE, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cv-00409-JAG) Submitted: July 23, 2020 Decided: July 27, 2020 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brenda Coleman Gillis, Appellant Pro S
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1179 BRENDA COLEMAN GILLIS, Debtor - Appellant, v. SUZANNE E. WADE, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cv-00409-JAG) Submitted: July 23, 2020 Decided: July 27, 2020 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brenda Coleman Gillis, Appellant Pro Se..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1179 BRENDA COLEMAN GILLIS, Debtor - Appellant, v. SUZANNE E. WADE, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cv-00409-JAG) Submitted: July 23, 2020 Decided: July 27, 2020 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brenda Coleman Gillis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Brenda Coleman Gillis appeals the district court’s order dismissing as moot her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order confirming the modified Chapter 13 Plan. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gillis v. Wade, No. 3:19-cv-00409-JAG (E.D. Va. Jan. 14, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
