Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Andrew Straw v. USDC N. District of Illinois, 20-1352 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 20-1352 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1352 ANDREW U.D. STRAW, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS; U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA; U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA; UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Sen
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1352 ANDREW U.D. STRAW, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS; U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA; U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA; UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:18-cv-00278-CMH-MSN) Submitted: July 21, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020 Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew U.D. Straw, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Andrew U.D. Straw appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Straw v. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, No. 1:18-cv-00278-CMH- MSN (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2020). We also deny Straw’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer