Filed: Jun. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1396 BRIAN DAVID HILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GLEN ANDREW HALL, ESQ., in his official capacity, Commonwealth Attorney of Martinsville, Virginia; GILES CARTER GREER, ESQ., Judge of Martinsville Circuit Court, in his official capacity; MATTHEW SCOTT THOMAS CLARK, ESQ., Attorney, in his official capacity; LAUREN MCGARRY, ESQ., Martinsville Public Defender Office, in her official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1396 BRIAN DAVID HILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GLEN ANDREW HALL, ESQ., in his official capacity, Commonwealth Attorney of Martinsville, Virginia; GILES CARTER GREER, ESQ., Judge of Martinsville Circuit Court, in his official capacity; MATTHEW SCOTT THOMAS CLARK, ESQ., Attorney, in his official capacity; LAUREN MCGARRY, ESQ., Martinsville Public Defender Office, in her official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1396 BRIAN DAVID HILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GLEN ANDREW HALL, ESQ., in his official capacity, Commonwealth Attorney of Martinsville, Virginia; GILES CARTER GREER, ESQ., Judge of Martinsville Circuit Court, in his official capacity; MATTHEW SCOTT THOMAS CLARK, ESQ., Attorney, in his official capacity; LAUREN MCGARRY, ESQ., Martinsville Public Defender Office, in her official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:20-cv-00017-JLK) Submitted: June 18, 2020 Decided: June 23, 2020 Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brian David Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Brian David Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Hall, No. 4:20-cv-00017-JLK (W.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2