Filed: Jul. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1412 KATIE PAGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY FAMILY COURT; HONORABLE JACK A. LANDIS; BRENT GREENBURG, Esq.; BARBARA PAGE; VA’ KEISHA PAGE; HONORABLE MICHELLE P. FORSYTHE; MEGAN HUNT DELL; S.C. LEGAL SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:20-cv-00852-DCN) Submitted: July 23, 2020 Deci
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1412 KATIE PAGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY FAMILY COURT; HONORABLE JACK A. LANDIS; BRENT GREENBURG, Esq.; BARBARA PAGE; VA’ KEISHA PAGE; HONORABLE MICHELLE P. FORSYTHE; MEGAN HUNT DELL; S.C. LEGAL SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:20-cv-00852-DCN) Submitted: July 23, 2020 Decid..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1412
KATIE PAGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLESTON COUNTY FAMILY COURT; HONORABLE JACK A. LANDIS;
BRENT GREENBURG, Esq.; BARBARA PAGE; VA’ KEISHA PAGE;
HONORABLE MICHELLE P. FORSYTHE; MEGAN HUNT DELL; S.C. LEGAL
SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:20-cv-00852-DCN)
Submitted: July 23, 2020 Decided: July 27, 2020
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Katie Page, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Katie Page appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing Page’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2018). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Page v.
Charleston Cty. Fam. Ct., No. 2:20-cv-00852-DCN (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2020). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2