Filed: Jun. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6200 LAMEEK JOHNS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. L. MULLINS, Defendant - Appellee, C. MESSER; B. MULLINS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:19-cv-00207-NKM-JCH) Submitted: June 16, 2020 Decided: June 19, 2020 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6200 LAMEEK JOHNS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. L. MULLINS, Defendant - Appellee, C. MESSER; B. MULLINS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:19-cv-00207-NKM-JCH) Submitted: June 16, 2020 Decided: June 19, 2020 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam o..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6200
LAMEEK JOHNS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
L. MULLINS,
Defendant - Appellee,
C. MESSER; B. MULLINS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:19-cv-00207-NKM-JCH)
Submitted: June 16, 2020 Decided: June 19, 2020
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lameek Shalam Johns, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lameek Shalam Johns seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his claim
as to one of the named defendants in his action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2018). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2018), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2018); Fed. R.
Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The
order Johns seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2