Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Clarence Harris v. City of Virginia Beach, 20-6737 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 20-6737 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6737 CLARENCE ELLIOTT HARRIS, as an individual, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal entity; HON. TERESA N. HAMMON, an individual; HON. ELIZABETH S. HODGES, an individual; DAVID M. O’DELL, an individual; COLIN STOLLE, an individual; SGT. B. JACKSON, VBPD, an individual; OFFICER T. W. LIPSEY, JR., VBPD, an individual; OFFICER A. N. MURAWSKI, VBPD, an individual; OFFICER P. E. GREENFIELD, VBPD, an ind
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6737 CLARENCE ELLIOTT HARRIS, as an individual, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal entity; HON. TERESA N. HAMMON, an individual; HON. ELIZABETH S. HODGES, an individual; DAVID M. O’DELL, an individual; COLIN STOLLE, an individual; SGT. B. JACKSON, VBPD, an individual; OFFICER T. W. LIPSEY, JR., VBPD, an individual; OFFICER A. N. MURAWSKI, VBPD, an individual; OFFICER P. E. GREENFIELD, VBPD, an individual, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:19-cv-00408-RBS-RJK) Submitted: October 20, 2020 Decided: October 23, 2020 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Elliott Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Gerald Logan Harris, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Clarence E. Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. City of Virginia Beach, No. 2:19-cv-00408-RBS-RJK (E.D. Va. May 11, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer