Filed: Oct. 19, 2021
Latest Update: Oct. 20, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7055
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEREMY MICHAEL MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Mike,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cr-00468-CCB-3)
Submitted: October 14, 2021 Decided: October 19, 2021
Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeremy Michael Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Mason Gruber, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jeremy Michael Montgomery appeals from the district court’s order denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. After reviewing the
record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that
the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors weighed against granting compassionate release in
Montgomery’s case. See United States v. Kibble,
992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021)
(per curiam) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order
on this basis. United States v. Montgomery, No. 1:15-cr-00468-CCB-3 (D. Md. May 28,
2021). We grant Montgomery’s motion for judicial notice and treat the motion as a
supplemental informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2