Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

National Labor Relations Board v. American Thread Company, 13586_1 (1951)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 13586_1 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 20, 1951
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 188 F.2d 161 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN THREAD COMPANY, Respondent. No. 13586. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. April 20, 1951. A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Costangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and BORAH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion is granted, with recognition of the fact that respondent do
More

188 F.2d 161

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
AMERICAN THREAD COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 13586.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

April 20, 1951.

A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Frank A. Costangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and BORAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motion is granted, with recognition of the fact that respondent does not resist, but claims to be in compliance with, with Board's order. The decree to be entered here, therefore, will provide that whatever the respondent has already done toward compliance with the order of the Board prior to entry of this Court's decree will not be required to be redone, and only such things, if any, as have been left undone will be required to be done.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer