Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In Re Bankers Life & Casualty Co, 14222 (1952)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 14222 Visitors: 20
Filed: Dec. 12, 1952
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 199 F.2d 593 In re BANKERS LIFE & CASUALTY CO. No. 14222. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. November 6, 1952. Rehearing Denied December 12, 1952. Charles F. Short, Jr., Chicago, Ill., Miller Walton, Miami, Fla., for appellant. M. H. Blackshear, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen. of Georgia, Lamar Sizemore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 Upon full consideration of the briefs and arguments on the motion to dismiss
More

199 F.2d 593

In re BANKERS LIFE & CASUALTY CO.

No. 14222.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

November 6, 1952.

Rehearing Denied December 12, 1952.

Charles F. Short, Jr., Chicago, Ill., Miller Walton, Miami, Fla., for appellant.

M. H. Blackshear, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen. of Georgia, Lamar Sizemore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon full consideration of the briefs and arguments on the motion to dismiss, the court is of the opinion that no fact or reason is stated showing that the relief by mandamus is an appropriate remedy. Without, therefore, determining, or considering on the merits, whether the order complained of was rightly entered, the motion to dismiss the petition, because the relief prayed for is not appropriate, is granted, and the petition is dismissed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer