Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mary Kathryn Smith v. United States, 19-70009 (1958)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 19-70009 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 25, 1958
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 251 F.2d 819 Mary Kathryn SMITH, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 16475. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. January 30, 1958. Rehearing Denied February 25, 1958. Charles W. Tessmer, Dallas, Tex., for appellant. William N. Hamilton, Asst. U. S. Atty., Minor Morgan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., Heard L. Floore, U. S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for appellee. Before TUTTLE, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The appellant appeals from a conviction under
More

251 F.2d 819

Mary Kathryn SMITH, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 16475.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

January 30, 1958.

Rehearing Denied February 25, 1958.

Charles W. Tessmer, Dallas, Tex., for appellant.

William N. Hamilton, Asst. U. S. Atty., Minor Morgan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., Heard L. Floore, U. S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The appellant appeals from a conviction under the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2313, of selling in Dallas, Texas, two automobiles which had been stolen in Wichita, Kansas, and which she knew had been stolen. The questions raised are not, in our opinion, substantial, and the errors, if any there were, at the trial, were harmless. The evidence was more than sufficient to sustain the verdict of guilt. The judgment appealed from is

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer