Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Elliott J. Roschuni and June Gillbert Roschuni v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 17779_1 (1959)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 17779_1 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 10, 1959
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 271 F.2d 267 59-2 USTC P 9748 Elliott J. ROSCHUNI and June Gillbert Roschuni, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. No. 17779. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Nov. 10, 1959. Llewellyn A. Luce, Washington, D.C., for petitioners. Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Arch M. Cantrall, Chief Counsel, John M. Morawski, Sp. Atty., I.R.S., David O. Walter, and Charles B. E. Freeman, Attys., Howard A. Heffron, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, A. F. Prescott, D
More

271 F.2d 267

59-2 USTC P 9748

Elliott J. ROSCHUNI and June Gillbert Roschuni, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 17779.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1959.

Llewellyn A. Luce, Washington, D.C., for petitioners.

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Arch M. Cantrall, Chief Counsel, John M. Morawski, Sp. Atty., I.R.S., David O. Walter, and Charles B. E. Freeman, Attys., Howard A. Heffron, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, A. F. Prescott, David O. Walter, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The facts from which this controversy arose and the reasons of the Tax Court for its decision are set forth in its opinion. Roschuni v. Commissioner, 29 T.C. 1193. We conclude that the decision of the Tax Court is a correct one and its judgment is

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer