Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Paul A. Lambert v. A. C. James, 18148_1 (1960)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 18148_1 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 22, 1960
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 276 F.2d 919 Paul A. LAMBERT, Appellant, v. A. C. JAMES, Appellee. No. 18148. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. April 22, 1960. Leon A. Picou, Jr., John R. Rarick, St. Francisville, La., George R. Blue, New Orleans, La., for appellant. Landman Teller, of Teller, Biedenharn & Rogers, Vicksburg, Miss., for appellee. Before HUTCHESON, TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 This appeal from the judgment of the Trial Court presents only questions of fact and one claim of erroneou
More

276 F.2d 919

Paul A. LAMBERT, Appellant,
v.
A. C. JAMES, Appellee.

No. 18148.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

April 22, 1960.

Leon A. Picou, Jr., John R. Rarick, St. Francisville, La., George R. Blue, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Landman Teller, of Teller, Biedenharn & Rogers, Vicksburg, Miss., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal from the judgment of the Trial Court presents only questions of fact and one claim of erroneous admission of testimony by a hand-writing expert. The legal ruling on the admissibility of the testimony was clearly without error. The fact issues were all resolved by detailed findings of fact by the Trial Court. The judgment is affirmed on the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Trial Court.

2

The subsidiary motions are denied.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer