Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 19238 (1961)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 19238 Visitors: 22
Filed: Nov. 10, 1961
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 297 F.2d 77 SUN OIL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent. No. 19238. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Nov. 10, 1961. John A. Ward, III, Philadelphia, Pa., Martin A. Row, Charles F. Heidrick, Dallas, Tex., Robert E. May, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Ralph S. Spritizer, Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Sol., Josephine H. Klein, Atty. F.P.C., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.
More

297 F.2d 77

SUN OIL COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 19238.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1961.

John A. Ward, III, Philadelphia, Pa., Martin A. Row, Charles F. Heidrick, Dallas, Tex., Robert E. May, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Ralph S. Spritizer, Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Sol., Josephine H. Klein, Atty. F.P.C., Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

It appearing that this Petition for Review seeks to modify or set aside certain orders of the Federal Power Commission issued by it in connection with its area-wide rate proceedings under Section 5(a) of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C.A. 717d(a), it is clear that it is an effort to review an interlocutory order of the kind which this Court held in Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, 236 F.2d 785, was not permissible.

2

The Motion of the Federal Power Commission to dismiss the Petition for Review is therefore granted. The Petition is dismissed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer