Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

William E. Lanham v. Southern Bakeries Company, Inc., 18801 (1961)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 18801 Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 31, 1961
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2017
Summary: 295 F.2d 816 132 U.S.P.Q. 168 William E. LANHAM, Appellant, v. SOUTHERN BAKERIES COMPANY, Inc., Appellee. No. 18801. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Oct. 31, 1961. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; Frank A. Hooper, Judge. Harry J. Mehre, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., John A. Mitchell, Robert D. Spille, New York City, Harold L. Stults, New York City, of counsel, for appellant. Otis A. Earl, Austin A. Webb, Kalamazoo, Mich., Hugh M. Dorsey, Jr.,
More

295 F.2d 816

132 U.S.P.Q. 168

William E. LANHAM, Appellant,
v.
SOUTHERN BAKERIES COMPANY, Inc., Appellee.

No. 18801.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 31, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; Frank A. Hooper, Judge.

Harry J. Mehre, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., John A. Mitchell, Robert D. Spille, New York City, Harold L. Stults, New York City, of counsel, for appellant.

Otis A. Earl, Austin A. Webb, Kalamazoo, Mich., Hugh M. Dorsey, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., Crenshaw, Hansell, Ware, Brandon & Dorsey, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and CAMERON and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

We have carefully considered the contentions of the appellant but find no basis for reversing either the findings of fact or the conclusions of law entered by the trial court. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court on the findings, conclusions and opinion of that Court, D.C., 198 F. Supp. 926.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer