Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Humbel Oil & Refining Company v. Noah S. Cutrer and Nicholas D. Olivier, Noah S. Cutrer and Nicholas D. Olivier v. Humble Oil & Befining Company, 19807_1 (1962)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 19807_1 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 27, 1962
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 309 F.2d 752 HUMBEL OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellant, v. Noah S. CUTRER and Nicholas D. Olivier, Appellees. Noah S. CUTRER and Nicholas D. Olivier, Appellants, v. HUMBLE OIL & BEFINING COMPANY, Appellee. No. 19807. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Nov. 28, 1962, Rehearing Denied Dec. 27, 1962. Andrew McCollam, Jr., L. K. Benson, H. H. Hillyer, Jr., W. J. McAnelly, Jr., Bernard J. Caillouet, Charles Janvier, New Orleans, La., for appellant. Arthur C. Reuter, Reuter, Reuter & Schott,
More

309 F.2d 752

HUMBEL OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Noah S. CUTRER and Nicholas D. Olivier, Appellees.
Noah S. CUTRER and Nicholas D. Olivier, Appellants,
v.
HUMBLE OIL & BEFINING COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 19807.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 28, 1962, Rehearing Denied Dec. 27, 1962.

Andrew McCollam, Jr., L. K. Benson, H. H. Hillyer, Jr., W. J. McAnelly, Jr., Bernard J. Caillouet, Charles Janvier, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Arthur C. Reuter, Reuter, Reuter & Schott, New Orleans, La., for Noah S. Cutrer and Nicholas D. Olivier.

Before HUTCHESON, CAMERON, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Finding ourselves in accord with the findings and conclusions of the district court as set forth in its opinion,1 we affirm its judgment for the reasons which it has assigned.

2

Affirmed.

1

Cutrer v. Humble Oil & Refining Company, D.C., 202 F. Supp. 568

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer