Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

57 Herkimer Street Corporation and Bessie Brouse Nelson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 19687_1 (1963)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 19687_1 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 26, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 316 F.2d 726 63-1 USTC P 9440 57 HERKIMER STREET CORPORATION and Bessie Brouse Nelson, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. No. 19687. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. April 29, 1963 Rehearing Denied June 26, 1963. Paul Arnold, Richard Z. Steinhaus, Boris Kostelanetz, New York City, for petitioners. Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Crane C. Hauser, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Rollin H. Transue, Atty., I.R.S., Martin
More

316 F.2d 726

63-1 USTC P 9440

57 HERKIMER STREET CORPORATION and Bessie Brouse Nelson, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 19687.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

April 29, 1963
Rehearing Denied June 26, 1963.

Paul Arnold, Richard Z. Steinhaus, Boris Kostelanetz, New York City, for petitioners.

Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Crane C. Hauser, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Rollin H. Transue, Atty., I.R.S., Martin B. Cowan, I. Henry Kutz, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before PHILLIPS,* CAMERON and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This income tax deficiency case turns, for the most part, on credibility choices. A study of the record and the findings and opinion of the Tax Court1 leads us to the conclusion that there is substantial evidence to support the Tax Court's findings and we agree with its conclusions. We find no merit in petitioners' argument that they were deprived of a fair trial bu the cumulative effect of alleged erroneous rulings, chiefly respecting the admission and exclusion of evidence by the trial court. The judgment of the Tax Court is

2

Affirmed.

*

Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation

1

1961 T.C. 223

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer