Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Otto Candies and Otto Candies, Inc. v. Paul Lee and Emile Lee, 20559_1 (1963)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 20559_1 Visitors: 19
Filed: Oct. 16, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 323 F.2d 363 Otto CANDIES and Otto Candies, Inc., Appellants, v. Paul LEE and Emile Lee, Appellees. No. 20559. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. October 16, 1963. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Robert A. Ainsworth, Jr., Judge. John Poitevent, New Orleans, La., Jas. Hy. Bruns, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, New Orleans, La., of counsel, for appellants. William M. Lucas, Jr., New Orleans, La., Dufour, Levy, Marx & Lucas, New
More

323 F.2d 363

Otto CANDIES and Otto Candies, Inc., Appellants,
v.
Paul LEE and Emile Lee, Appellees.

No. 20559.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

October 16, 1963.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Robert A. Ainsworth, Jr., Judge.

John Poitevent, New Orleans, La., Jas. Hy. Bruns, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, New Orleans, La., of counsel, for appellants.

William M. Lucas, Jr., New Orleans, La., Dufour, Levy, Marx & Lucas, New Orleans, La., of counsel, for appellees.

Before RIVES and JONES, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, Jr., District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal presents the question whether the Tug Captain Paul was solely at fault in its collision with a small lugger, the Miss Mazur. The findings of fact and conclusions of law by the District Court, reported at 216 F. Supp. 665 (1963), are not clearly erroneous and adequately support the judgment. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer