Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

No. 21376, 997 (1964)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 997
Filed: Nov. 30, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 338 F.2d 997 Ollie E. ESTES, Appellant, UNITED STATES of America, No. 183, Docket 28931. failure to file income tax returns. 26 appellant's somewhat fantastic testimony v. Anthony J. CELEBREZZE, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellee. No. 21376. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Nov. 30, 1964. James L. Shores, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for appellant. John R. Thomas, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Macon L. Weaver, U.S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., for appellee. Before JONES and BELL, C
More

338 F.2d 997

Ollie E. ESTES, Appellant,
UNITED STATES of America,
No. 183, Docket 28931. failure to file income tax returns.
26 appellant's somewhat fantastic testimony
v.
Anthony J. CELEBREZZE, Secretary of Health, Education and
Welfare, Appellee.

No. 21376.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 30, 1964.

James L. Shores, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for appellant.

John R. Thomas, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Macon L. Weaver, U.S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., for appellee.

Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and HUNTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

This is an appeal from a decision of the District Court affirming a determination by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare that appellant is not entitled to disability benefits under the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C.A. 405(g), 416(i), and 423. To establish disability under the act, the claimant must demonstrate an 'inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity.' The Hearing Examiner found that appellant's physical impairments did not prevent him from performing non-strenuous work not requiring education for skill and concluded that disability within the Act was not established. The Appeals Council denied review.

2

After a careful review of the record, we are convinced that the Hearing Examiner applied correct legal standards and that his findings are supported by substantial evidence. Consequently, the judgment appealed from must be and it is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer