Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Phoenix Assurance Company of New York v. Linea De Navegacion Rio, S.A., 21522_1 (1965)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 21522_1 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 12, 1965
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 341 F.2d 582 PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. LINEA DE NAVEGACION RIO, S.A., et al., Appellees. No. 21522. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Feb. 12, 1965. James O. Davis, Jr., Tampa, Fla., Joseph J. Magrath, III, New York City, Brendan P. O'Sullivan, Cody Fowler, Tampa, Fla., Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam, Tampa, Fla., of counsel, for appellant. Joseph A. McClain, Jr., O. K. Reaves, of Carlton, Fields, Ward
More

341 F.2d 582

PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellant,
v.
LINEA DE NAVEGACION RIO, S.A., et al., Appellees.

No. 21522.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 12, 1965.

James O. Davis, Jr., Tampa, Fla., Joseph J. Magrath, III, New York City, Brendan P. O'Sullivan, Cody Fowler, Tampa, Fla., Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam, Tampa, Fla., of counsel, for appellant.

Joseph A. McClain, Jr., O. K. Reaves, of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tampa, Fla., for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DYER, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

All of the issues raised by appellant here are issues of fact. Each of the findings of the trial court was based on substantial evidence and will, therefore, not be reviewed here.

2

The judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer