Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Walter Woodson Kolomyski v. United States, 21917_1 (1965)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 21917_1 Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 22, 1965
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 351 F.2d 950 Walter Woodson KOLOMYSKI, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 21917. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Oct. 22, 1965. Steadman S. Stahl, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for appellant. Clinton Ashmore, U.S. Atty., C. W. Eggart, Jr., Stewart J. Carrouth, Asst. U.S. Attys., Tallahassee, Fla., for appellee. Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges and JOHNSON, District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 We have carefully considered the testimony alleged to have constituted erro
More

351 F.2d 950

Walter Woodson KOLOMYSKI, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 21917.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 22, 1965.

Steadman S. Stahl, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for appellant.

Clinton Ashmore, U.S. Atty., C. W. Eggart, Jr., Stewart J. Carrouth, Asst. U.S. Attys., Tallahassee, Fla., for appellee.

Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges and JOHNSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

We have carefully considered the testimony alleged to have constituted error in the context of the trial and conclude that it was not such a prejudicial error as would require reversal.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer