Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wholesale Coke Company, Inc. v. Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc., 22295_1 (1966)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 22295_1 Visitors: 34
Filed: Feb. 18, 1966
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 355 F.2d 932 WHOLESALE COKE COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, Inc., et al., Appellees. No. 22295. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. February 18, 1966. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; Edwin F. Hunter, Jr., Judge. Franz Joseph Baddock, Baton Rouge, La., for appellant. LeDoux R. Provosty, Alexandria, La., for appellees. Before HUTCHESON and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and FISHER, District Judge. PER CURIA
More

355 F.2d 932

WHOLESALE COKE COMPANY, Inc., Appellant,
v.
CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, Inc., et al., Appellees.

No. 22295.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

February 18, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; Edwin F. Hunter, Jr., Judge.

Franz Joseph Baddock, Baton Rouge, La., for appellant.

LeDoux R. Provosty, Alexandria, La., for appellees.

Before HUTCHESON and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and FISHER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal is from a judgment denying appellant Wholesale Coke Company recovery against appellees Central Louisiana Electric Company and Louisiana Intrastate Gas Corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of Central Louisiana) for materials supplied by Wholesale to one Henry Allen for use on a construction project for appellees. Wholesale, upon non-payment by Allen, brought this action against appellees alleging that Allen was their agent and, in the alternative, that appellees were equitably estopped from denying liability for the materials. The District Court filed concise findings of fact and conclusions of law in which it ruled that no facts were proven to establish agency or to invoke equitable estoppel.

2

A careful consideration of the record convinces us that the Court's findings are fully supported by the evidence and that its decision and judgment are correct and must be affirmed.

3

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer