Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dewey Lawrence Cobb v. United States, 24261 (1967)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 24261 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 06, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 383 F.2d 789 Dewey Lawrence COBB, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 24261. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Oct. 9, 1967. Rehearing Denied Dec. 6, 1967. Clyde Gordon, Eddington, Kroll, Friloux & Smith, and C. Anthony Friloux, Jr., Houston, Tex., for appellant. James R. Gough, Douglas M. Smith, Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., Morton L. Susman, U. S. Atty., Fred L. Hartman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for appellee. Before BELL, COLEMAN and GODBOLD, Circui
More

383 F.2d 789

Dewey Lawrence COBB, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 24261.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 9, 1967.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 6, 1967.

Clyde Gordon, Eddington, Kroll, Friloux & Smith, and C. Anthony Friloux, Jr., Houston, Tex., for appellant.

James R. Gough, Douglas M. Smith, Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., Morton L. Susman, U. S. Atty., Fred L. Hartman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for appellee.

Before BELL, COLEMAN and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding appellant guilty of transporting a stolen motor vehicle in interstate commerce. 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2312. The sole assignment of error is the claim that the prosecutor engaged in prejudicial argument. We hold that the argument was not prejudicial. Moreover, there was no objection to the argument and it did not remotely approach plain error.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer