Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 461, 1 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9840 James G. Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, 24288_1 (1967)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 24288_1 Visitors: 22
Filed: Dec. 05, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 386 F.2d 452 9 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 461 , 1 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9840 James G. GLOVER et al., Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY et al., Appellees. No. 24288. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Dec. 5, 1967. William M. Acker, Jr., Macon L. Weaver, Oscar W. Adams, Jr., Lynn G. Baldwin, Birmingham, Ala., H. Carl Isaacs, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., Smyer, White, Reid & Acker, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for appellants. Jerome A. Cooper, William J. Gardner, Drayton T
More

386 F.2d 452

9 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 461, 1 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9840
James G. GLOVER et al., Appellants,
v.
ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY et al., Appellees.

No. 24288.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 5, 1967.

William M. Acker, Jr., Macon L. Weaver, Oscar W. Adams, Jr., Lynn G. Baldwin, Birmingham, Ala., H. Carl Isaacs, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., Smyer, White, Reid & Acker, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for appellants.

Jerome A. Cooper, William J. Gardner, Drayton T. Scott, Birmingham, Ala., Paul R. Moody, St. Louis, Mo., Richard R. Lyman, Donald W. Fisher, Toledo, Ohio, Benj. L. Erdreich, Birmingham, Ala., Mulholland, Hickey & Lyman, Toledo, Ohio, and Cooper, Mitch & Crawford, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for appellee Brotherhood of Railway Carmen of America.

Before RIVES, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

We agree with the opinion and decision of the district court. In addition to the authorities there cited, see Republic Steel Corporation v. Maddox, 1965, 379 U.S. 650, 85 S. Ct. 614, 13 L. Ed. 2d 580; Walker v. Southern Railway Co., 1966, 385 U.S. 196, 87 S. Ct. 365, 17 L. Ed. 2d 294; Vaca v. Sipes, 1967, 386 U.S. 171, 87 S. Ct. 903, 17 L. Ed. 2d 842; Steen v. Local Union No. 163, 6 Cir. 1967, 373 F.2d 519; Howard v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 8 Cir. 1966, 361 F.2d 905. The judgment is

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer