Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Clifton S. Stout v. United States, 24531 (1967)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 24531 Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 06, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 383 F.2d 448 Clifton S. STOUT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 24531. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Oct. 6, 1967. Clifton S. Stout, pro se. J. V. Eskenazi, Asst. U.S. Atty., William A. Meadows, Jr., U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellee. Before TUTTLE, GEWIN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Appellant's sole allegation is that his pleas of guilty to five charges of interstate transportation of forged securities, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2314, wer
More

383 F.2d 448

Clifton S. STOUT, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 24531.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 6, 1967.

Clifton S. Stout, pro se.

J. V. Eskenazi, Asst. U.S. Atty., William A. Meadows, Jr., U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, GEWIN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant's sole allegation is that his pleas of guilty to five charges of interstate transportation of forged securities, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2314, were not understandingly and voluntarily made. This contention is conclusively refuted by the files and records of the case. Therefore, motion to vacate judgment was properly denied. 28 U.S.C. 2255. Helpman v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 373 F.2d 401; Clark v. United States, 5 Cir., 1966, 367 F.2d 378; Barrett v. United States, 5 Cir., 1962, 302 F.2d 151.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer