Filed: Mar. 18, 1968
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 393 F.2d 22 Michael Doud GILL, Appellant, v. M. E. MILLER, Appellee. No. 24876. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. March 18, 1968. G. Morton Good, Cromwell A. Anderson, Smathers & Thompson, Miami, Fla., for appellant. Martin Greenbaum, Miami Beach, Fla., for appellee. Before TUTTLE and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges, and HOOPER, District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Concluding, as we do, that the trial court had a broad discretion in determining whether to grant or withhold immunity to a non-reside
Summary: 393 F.2d 22 Michael Doud GILL, Appellant, v. M. E. MILLER, Appellee. No. 24876. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. March 18, 1968. G. Morton Good, Cromwell A. Anderson, Smathers & Thompson, Miami, Fla., for appellant. Martin Greenbaum, Miami Beach, Fla., for appellee. Before TUTTLE and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges, and HOOPER, District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Concluding, as we do, that the trial court had a broad discretion in determining whether to grant or withhold immunity to a non-residen..
More
393 F.2d 22
Michael Doud GILL, Appellant,
v.
M. E. MILLER, Appellee.
No. 24876.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
March 18, 1968.
G. Morton Good, Cromwell A. Anderson, Smathers & Thompson, Miami, Fla., for appellant.
Martin Greenbaum, Miami Beach, Fla., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges, and HOOPER, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Concluding, as we do, that the trial court had a broad discretion in determining whether to grant or withhold immunity to a non-resident from being served with process while a subpoenaed witness at a hearing in the Southern District of Florida, Lamb v. Schmitt, 285 U.S. 222, 52 S. Ct. 317, 76 L. Ed. 720 (1932); Page Co. v. MacDonald, 261 U.S. 446, 43 S. Ct. 416, 67 L. Ed. 737; Stewart v. Ramsay, 242 U.S. 128, 34 S. Ct. 44, 61 L. Ed. 192, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
