Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

National Labor Relations Board v. Animal Foods Company of Texas, Inc., 25097 (1968)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 25097 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 07, 1968
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 395 F.2d 744 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ANIMAL FOODS COMPANY OF TEXAS, Inc., Respondent. No. 25097. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. June 7, 1968. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Vivian A. Asplund, Atty., NL RB, Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Andrew C. Partee, Jr., Kullman & Lang, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before COLEMAN and GODBOLD,
More

395 F.2d 744

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
ANIMAL FOODS COMPANY OF TEXAS, Inc., Respondent.

No. 25097.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 7, 1968.

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Vivian A. Asplund, Atty., NL RB, Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner.

Andrew C. Partee, Jr., Kullman & Lang, New Orleans, La., for respondent.

Before COLEMAN and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges, and RUBIN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

The National Labor Relations Board found that respondent, Animal Foods Company of Texas, Inc., violated §§ 8 (a) (1) and 8(a) (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, by coercive interrogation of certain employees and by an allegedly discriminatory discharge of an employee by the name of Peeler. The Board petitions for enforcement of its order.

2

The findings of the Board are supported by the record, considered as a whole, Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S. Ct. 456, 95 L. Ed. 456 (1951); NLRB v. Camco, Inc., 5 Cir., 1965, 340 F.2d 803, cert. denied 382 U.S. 926, 86 S. Ct. 313, 15 L. Ed. 2d 339; NLRB v. Certain-Teed Products Corp., 5 Cir., 1968, 387 F.2d 639 [January 12, 1968]; NLRB v. West Point Manufacturing Company, 5 Cir., 1957, 245 F.2d 783.

3

Enforced.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer