Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

James M. Phillips v. Alabama Credit Corporation D/B/A Fidelity Securities Corporation, 25331_1 (1968)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 25331_1 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 25, 1968
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 403 F.2d 692 James M. PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. ALABAMA CREDIT CORPORATION d/b/a Fidelity Securities Corporation, Appellee. No. 25331. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Nov. 25, 1968. Thomas M. Haas, Mobile, Ala., for appellant. Willis C. Darby, Jr., Kilborn, Darby & Kilborn, Mobile, Ala., for appellee. Before JOHN R BROWN, Chief Judge, and RIVES and McENTEE, * Circuit judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Phillips appeals from a directed verdict in favor of Alabama Credit Corp. on three counts of sec
More

403 F.2d 692

James M. PHILLIPS, Appellant,
v.
ALABAMA CREDIT CORPORATION d/b/a Fidelity Securities
Corporation, Appellee.

No. 25331.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 25, 1968.

Thomas M. Haas, Mobile, Ala., for appellant.

Willis C. Darby, Jr., Kilborn, Darby & Kilborn, Mobile, Ala., for appellee.

Before JOHN R BROWN, Chief Judge, and RIVES and McENTEE,* Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Phillips appeals from a directed verdict in favor of Alabama Credit Corp. on three counts of securities fraud in violation of 12(2), 17 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C.A. 77l(2), 77q, and the Alabama misrepresentation statute, 7 Ala.Code 108 (1958).1

2

Phillips offered no evidence to contradict the overwhelming proof that he committed the fraudulent acts. The only evidence offered by Phillips was reputation testimony from rriends and associates. It is clear that fraudulent intent need not be proved and that testimony of the defendant's reputation in the community is not enough to refute overwhelming proof of fraud. Wilko v. Swan, 1953, 346 U.S. 427, 431, 74 S. Ct. 182, 98 L. Ed. 168, 173; S.E.C. v. Capital Gaines Research Bureau, 1963, 375 U.S. 180, 192, 195, 84 S. Ct. 275, 283-284, 11 L. Ed. 2d 237, 246, 248; Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. Osborne, 1945, 32 Ala.App. 220, 23 So. 2d 864, cert. denied, 247 Ala. 252, 23 So. 2d 867.

3

Affirmed.

*

From the First Circuit, sitting by designation

1

This is a companion case to Phillips v. Alabama Credit Corp., 403 F.2d 693, decided this day, which involved violations of these same statutes

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer