Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Ralph Michael Lepiscopo, 26868_1 (1969)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 26868_1
Filed: Apr. 16, 1969
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 409 F.2d 843 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ralph Michael LEPISCOPO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 26868. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. April 16, 1969. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Ralph Michael Lepiscopo, pro se. Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty., Theodore E. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Pursuant to
More

409 F.2d 843

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ralph Michael LEPISCOPO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 26868.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

April 16, 1969.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Ralph Michael Lepiscopo, pro se.

Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty., Theodore E. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I [dated March 11, 1969].

2

The Judgment of the District Court is reversed. The case is remanded for a new trial in light of Blake v. United States, (5 Cir., 1969) 407 F.2d 908 (en banc).

3

Reversed and remanded.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer