Filed: Apr. 06, 1970
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 419 F.2d 1326 David LAWRENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee. No. 26767. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. November 24, 1969. Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 12, 1970. Certiorari Denied April 6, 1970. See 90 S. Ct. 1281 . David Lawrence, pro se. Paul E. Gifford, Miami, Fla. (Ct. Apptd.), for appellant. Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. of Florida, Miami, Fla., Arden M. Siegendorf, Ass
Summary: 419 F.2d 1326 David LAWRENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee. No. 26767. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. November 24, 1969. Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 12, 1970. Certiorari Denied April 6, 1970. See 90 S. Ct. 1281 . David Lawrence, pro se. Paul E. Gifford, Miami, Fla. (Ct. Apptd.), for appellant. Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. of Florida, Miami, Fla., Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst..
More
419 F.2d 1326
David LAWRENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 26767.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
November 24, 1969.
Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 12, 1970.
Certiorari Denied April 6, 1970.
See 90 S. Ct. 1281.
David Lawrence, pro se.
Paul E. Gifford, Miami, Fla. (Ct. Apptd.), for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. of Florida, Miami, Fla., Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Fla., for appellee.
Before RIVES, BELL, and DYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
This appeal, filed sixty three days after the denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, is dismissed. See Allen v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1967, 384 F.2d 745. There is no showing that the failure to file the notice of appeal within the extended time period of 30 days provided under Rule 4(a), Federal Rules Appellate Procedure, was attributable to anyone other than appellant. We thus deem the case of Fallen v. United States, 1964, 378 U.S. 139, 84 S. Ct. 1689, 12 L. Ed. 2d 760, to be inapplicable.
4
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM:
5
The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.
