Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Clark Equipment Company v. Armstrong Equipment Company, 28725_1 (1970)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 28725_1 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 07, 1970
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 434 F.2d 1039 CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ARMSTRONG EQUIPMENT COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 28725. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 7, 1970. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama at Birmingham; Seybourn H. Lynne, Judge. William G. West, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., Sirote, Permutt, Friend & Friedman, Morris K. Sirote, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel for appellants. James C. Barton, Charles L. Robi
More

434 F.2d 1039

CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
ARMSTRONG EQUIPMENT COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 28725.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 7, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama at Birmingham; Seybourn H. Lynne, Judge.

William G. West, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., Sirote, Permutt, Friend & Friedman, Morris K. Sirote, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel for appellants.

James C. Barton, Charles L. Robinson, Birmingham, Ala., Deramus & Johnston, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for appellees.

Before JONES, WISDOM and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 54.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer