Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

1026 (1971)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 1026 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 19, 1971
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 438 F.2d 1026 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2623 , 64 Lab.Cas. P 11,512 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. NEW FERN RESTORIUM COMPANY, Respondent. No. 30325 Summary Calendar.* *Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409 , Part I. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Feb. 19, 1971. Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Coun
More

438 F.2d 1026

76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2623, 64 Lab.Cas. P 11,512

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
NEW FERN RESTORIUM COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 30325 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970,
431 F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 19, 1971.

Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen., Counsel, Eugene B. Granof, Frank Vogl, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

John K. Pickens, Alexandria, Va., for respondent.

Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Florida Case). Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Enforced. See Local Rule 21.1

1

Enforced.

1

Local Rule 21

When the court determines that any one or more of the following circumstances exists and is dispositive of a matter submitted to the court for decision: (1) that a judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact which are not clearly erroneous; (2) that the evidence in support of a jury verdict is not insufficient; (3) that the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; (4) that no error of law appears; and the court also determines that an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer