Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

David C. Richardson v. Elliott L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 30247 (1971)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 30247 Visitors: 30
Filed: Jan. 06, 1971
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 437 F.2d 109 David C. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Elliott L. RICHARDSON, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Defendant-Appellee. No. 30247 Summary Calendar. * United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 11, 1970. Rehearing Denied January 6, 1971. William C. Davis, Jr., John B. L'Engle, Jacksonville, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant. John L. Briggs, U. S. Atty., John D. Roberts, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., for defendant-appellee. Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODB
More

437 F.2d 109

David C. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Elliott L. RICHARDSON, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 30247 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 11, 1970.

Rehearing Denied January 6, 1971.

William C. Davis, Jr., John B. L'Engle, Jacksonville, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

John L. Briggs, U. S. Atty., John D. Roberts, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., for defendant-appellee.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks review of an order of the district court affirming a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare which denied his application for social security disability benefits.

2

We are not to reweigh evidence or substitute our judgment for that of the Secretary. The role of the court is to determine if there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Secretary's decision. Rome v. Finch, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 1329.

3

The gravamen of appellant's complaint is that the medical evidence to sustain his disability prior to and since the date he was last insured was ignored in the lower proceedings. We find conflicts in the medical evidence and these are to be determined by the Secretary. Aldridge v. Celebrezze, 5 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 190. They were determined adversely to appellant.

4

Finding substantial evidence in the record consistent with the above standard, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Notes:

*

[1] Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer