Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Edward L. Esneault v. Waterman Steamship Corporation, 71-2160 (1971)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 71-2160 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 26, 1971
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 449 F.2d 1296 Edward L. ESNEAULT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 71-2160 Summary Calendar. * United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. October 26, 1971. Darryl J. Tschirn, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant. Thomas W. Thorne, Jr., Lemle, Kelleher, Kohlmeyer, Matthews & Schumacher, Gothard J. Reck, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellee. Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: 1 Appellee's motion to dismiss this
More

449 F.2d 1296

Edward L. ESNEAULT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 71-2160 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

October 26, 1971.

Darryl J. Tschirn, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

Thomas W. Thorne, Jr., Lemle, Kelleher, Kohlmeyer, Matthews & Schumacher, Gothard J. Reck, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellee.

Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

Appellee's motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction is granted. The granting of a motion for a mistrial is not a final order which terminates the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing to be done but to enforce by execution what has been determined. Gilmore v. United States, 5 Cir. 1959, 264 F.2d 44, 45. Finality is necessary to bring the order within our appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291.

2

Dismissed.

Notes:

*

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer