Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Paul Joseph Theriseaud, 71-2025 (1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 71-2025 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 28, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 456 F.2d 278 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul Joseph THERISEAUD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 71-2025. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Feb. 28, 1972. C. D. Moyers, Moyers & Searls, El Paso, Tex., for defendant-appellant. Seagal V. Wheatley, U. S. Atty., Victor K. Sizemore, Edward Marquez, Asst. U. S. Attys., El Paso, Tex., William S. Sessions, U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee. Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Appella
More

456 F.2d 278

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Paul Joseph THERISEAUD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 71-2025.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 28, 1972.

C. D. Moyers, Moyers & Searls, El Paso, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Seagal V. Wheatley, U. S. Atty., Victor K. Sizemore, Edward Marquez, Asst. U. S. Attys., El Paso, Tex., William S. Sessions, U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant was convicted of violating Title 21 U.S.C.A., Sec. 176a through the alleged importation of 53 pounds of marihuana into the United States from Mexico. The sole assignment of error is that the district court erred in denying appellant's motion for acquittal based on the claimed insufficiency of the evidence.

2

We have carefully considered the evidence. It was more than ample to make an issue for the jury and to support the jury verdict of guilty.

3

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer