Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

71-2492 (1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 71-2492 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 17, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 452 F.2d 1388 Kittridge TROXLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, George Clark and Ezekiel Jackson, Intervenors-Appellees, v. ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH POLICE JURY, Defendant-Appellant, Henry J. Hymel, Rudolph S. Sorapuru, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 71-2492. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Jan. 17, 1972. Benjamin E. Smith, Smith & Scheuermann, New Orleans, La., for Hymel et al. A. M. Trudeau, Jr., New Orleans, La., for intervenors. Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Reserve, La., Norman J. Pitre
More

452 F.2d 1388

Kittridge TROXLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, George Clark and
Ezekiel Jackson, Intervenors-Appellees,
v.
ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH POLICE JURY, Defendant-Appellant,
Henry J. Hymel, Rudolph S. Sorapuru, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 71-2492.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 17, 1972.

Benjamin E. Smith, Smith & Scheuermann, New Orleans, La., for Hymel et al.

A. M. Trudeau, Jr., New Orleans, La., for intervenors.

Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Reserve, La., Norman J. Pitre, Luling, La., Melvin Barre, Dist. Atty., Edgrad, La., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The appellants having moved to dismiss the appeal, it is ordered that the appeal in the above styled and numbered cause be and is hereby dismissed. Rule 42(b), F.R.A.P.

2

It is further ordered that either party may file a motion in the district court to amend that court's judgment for purposes of clarification. Any such motion must be filed not later than ten days after entry of this order. See Rule 59(e), F.R.Civ.P.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer