Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Marilyn Marie Monteilh v. St. Landry Parish School Board, United States of America, Amicus Curiae, 71-2604 (1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 71-2604 Visitors: 32
Filed: Jan. 03, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 451 F.2d 1348 Marilyn Marie MONTEILH et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ST. LANDRY PARISH SCHOOL BOARD et al., Defendants-Appellees, United States of America, Amicus Curiae. No. 71-2604. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Jan. 3, 1972. Jack Greenberg, New York City, Marion Overton White, Opelousas, La., Norman Chachkin, New York City, A. P. Tureaud, New Orleans, La., Margrett Ford, Shreveport, La., for plaintiffs-appellants. J. Y. Fontenot Dist. Atty., 27th Judicial Dist., Opelousas,
More

451 F.2d 1348

Marilyn Marie MONTEILH et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ST. LANDRY PARISH SCHOOL BOARD et al., Defendants-Appellees,
United States of America, Amicus Curiae.

No. 71-2604.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 3, 1972.

Jack Greenberg, New York City, Marion Overton White, Opelousas, La., Norman Chachkin, New York City, A. P. Tureaud, New Orleans, La., Margrett Ford, Shreveport, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

J. Y. Fontenot Dist. Atty., 27th Judicial Dist., Opelousas, La., Harry J. Kron, Jr., Thibodeaux, La., Edward Christenbury, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Washington, D.C., Lawrence Sandoz, Jr., Opelousas, La., Donald E. Walter, U. S. Atty., Shreveport, La., for defendants-appellees.

Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

The order appealed from, reflecting the informed judgment of the district court, is affirmed, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 91 S. Ct. 1267, 28 L. Ed. 2d 554 (1971). The district court correctly retained jurisdiction of this proceeding and should continue to maintain that jurisdiction for a minimum period of three years. In no event should the district court dismiss this action without notice to the plaintiffs below and a hearing providing opportunity to plaintiffs to show that deliberate action by school authorities or some other agency of the State has affected the unitary status of this system so that further intervention of the district court is required. See Swann, supra, and Calhoun v. Cook, 451 F.2d 583 (5th Cir. 1971) and the cases cited in that opinion.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer