Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

August Williams v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, 71-2674 (1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 71-2674 Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 16, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 465 F.2d 995 August WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee. No. 71-2674. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Aug. 16, 1972. Thomas F. Schexnayder, New Orleans, La. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen. of La., Baton Rouge, La., Maurice R. Franks, New Orleans, La., for respondent-appellee. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and RIVES and CLARK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
More

465 F.2d 995

August WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary,
Respondent-Appellee.

No. 71-2674.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 16, 1972.

Thomas F. Schexnayder, New Orleans, La. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen. of La., Baton Rouge, La., Maurice R. Franks, New Orleans, La., for respondent-appellee.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and RIVES and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Petitioner was convicted on a Louisiana charge of aggravated rape and sentenced to death. After exhausting State remedies, he filed the present Sec. 2254 application for writ of habeas corpus which was denied by the District Court. We vacate and remand.

2

Petitioner asserts two constitutional grounds for setting aside his death penalty. The first of these, the Witherspoon1 issue, need not be confronted because recent Supreme Court pronouncement makes clear that his second contention, the assertion that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment in contravention of the Eighth Amendment, requires reconsideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by the District Court. Accordingly, we vacate the District Court's order and remand for reconsideration in light of Furman v. Georgia, 1972, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S. Ct. 2726, 33 L. Ed. 2d 346 and companion cases.

3

Vacated and remanded.

1

Witherspoon v. Illinois, 1968, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S. Ct. 1770, 20 L. Ed. 2d 776. The issue here involved analysis of a Witherspoon problem in light of La.C.Cr.P. Art. 799

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer